MEANS OF LINGUISTIC EXPRESSION AND CINEMATOGRAPHIC VOCABULARY AS MARKER OF INTERMEDIALITY IN M. SPARK'S NOVEL "IN PUBLIC"

Authors

  • Olena Terekhovska Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
  • Yuliya Lenko Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31471/2304-7402-2025-21(77)-198-205

Keywords:

linguistic expressiveness, satire, irony, epithet, metaphor, comparison, cinematic vocabulary, intermediality.

Abstract

The article explores the artistic manifestation of intermedial content in Muriel Spark’s novel The Public Image. It is found, in particular, that a significant means of realizing intermediality in the novel is the use of linguistic expressivenessspecifically satire, irony, epithets, metaphors, and comparisons. It is demonstrated that satire and irony are employed to ridicule established social norms and priorities, which the author views as false or even absurd. Epithets, metaphors, and comparisons, in turn, contribute to the creation of vivid artistic imagery.

 

The study also shows that an important tool for the artistic actualization of intermediality in the novel is the use of cinematographic vocabulary and terminology. These elements help achieve a visual effect by participating in the construction of frame-like scenes.

It is established that both means of linguistic expressiveness and cinematic vocabularyfunctioning as markers of intermedialityplay an active role in shaping the novel’s artistic space. These elements enhance the emotional depth of the text, evoking a broader range of feelings and impressions in the reader. Furthermore, they aid in the creation of compelling and memorable images, as well as in portraying original and unpredictable plot developments. This, in turn, captures the reader’s attention and adds to the aesthetic appeal of the text.

References

1. Edgecombe, R.S. (1990). Vocation and Identity in the Fiction of Muriel Spark. Columbia& London: University of Missouri Press. 165 p.

2. Kattenbelt, C. (2008). Intermediality in theatre and performance: definitions, perceptions and media relationships. Culture, language and representation. Vol. 6. P. 19-29.

3. Пєшкова, О. А. (2019). Інтермедіальність англійськомовних художніх текстів ХХ-ХХІ століть: когнітивно-семіотичний аспект: дис. канд. філол. наук: 10.02.04. Запоріжжя. 250 с.

4. Pieshkova, O. (2018). Verbal representations of art concept in the literary text throughthe prism of intermediality. East European Scientific Journal. № 3 (31). P. 69-71.

5. Spark, M. (1976). The public image. Stories. 292 p. Телегіна, Н.І. (2018). Зарубіжна література другої половини ХХ століття: хрестоматія. Івано-Франківськ. 150 с.

6. Ференц, Н.С. (2021). Сучасні методологічні засади літературознавст-ва: навчально-методичний посібник для студентів філологічного факультету; Упоряд. О. М. Чижмар; відповід. за вип. В. В. Барчан. Ужгород: Ґражда. 140 с.

7. Шевчук, Т.Б. Ткачук, О.С. (2022). Мовностилістичні особливості оповідання Остапа Вишні «Веселі артисти». Нова Педагогічна Думка. № 1. Т. 109. С. 65-72.

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Terekhovska, O., & Lenko, Y. (2025). MEANS OF LINGUISTIC EXPRESSION AND CINEMATOGRAPHIC VOCABULARY AS MARKER OF INTERMEDIALITY IN M. SPARK’S NOVEL "IN PUBLIC". PRECARPATHIAN BULLETIN OF THE SHEVCHENKO SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY Word, (21(77), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.31471/2304-7402-2025-21(77)-198-205